War Can Never Be Justified Essay

  • Yes ofcourse it is

    There is always a reason a war is started, there are a wide variety of reasons (e.G religion, money, power, pure hatred) that can relate to each war that has erupted. In the country's best interest, why would a war start for absolutely no reason? There will always be a gain if won, which is the justified reason for a war!

  • War can be justified when there is a humanitarian crisis.

    Going to war entails a lot of casualties and damage to properties, but if it means saving people against genocide and other atrocities, it is necessary. A country may not be involved in other country's affairs within its jurisdiction, but when it genocides its own people, I believe that other countries should intervene now. Sovereignty does not excuse a country to kill its own people without intervention. Saving the humanity is a reason to go to war even if it involves sacrifices, we cannot just do nothing.

  • All wars are justifiable, few are justified.

    Any war can be justifiable. Justifiable no man would ever take the risks that war encumbers without reason. The real question is whether or not the given reason is moral. What, therefore, would make a war moral, or immoral? Are morals absolute, or are they up to individuals? Should morals be based on feelings, religion, or other reasons? Do ends justify means? These are the true questions that must be answered before the question of justified war can be answered, and unfortunately each point is complicated and has been individually debated for as long as human history. I will therefor give my own opinion without reasoning, as the reasoning itself would take several drawn out conversations, or books to even begin to express. Yes, there are absolute morals. These morals stem from a literal translation of original canon of the Christian Bible (this includes the Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim, Gospels, Epistles, and the book of Revelation). Finally, no, the ends never justify the means. Based on these presumptions I believe that war can, and should always be fought if other criteria are met. First it should be in the protection of others (this may include your own citizens), never for personal gain or interest. Second, these others must want your help. Third, without compromising the first two conditions, you must do everything in your power to resolve a conflict peacefully. All three conditions must be met for a war to be justified, but if even one is not met, the war can never be justified. If there are any arguments or problems with the assertions I have made please do reply debate is a great and glorious thing if used with the desire to find truth.

    P.S. It should be noted that my unwillingness to explain my beliefs in further detail a major cop out, and one that I hope to address in some way. Mabey I will write several books if I must, but just be aware that I do have very sound reasoning, and careful consideration that has led to my beliefs as they are.

  • Is war ever justified? Yes, yes it is

    I think war can be justified. Take for example World War 2. Could anyone with a clean conscience just sit and watch while Hitler took over the world? No! Take another example. North Korea. If they try to bomb us, will we just let them murder us all? No! We fight back and defend ourselves, even if it causes a war.

  • Yes, you can't just do nothing.

    You see, when it comes to war, everyone has their own opinions. But weighing the pros and cons can usually help someone come to a decision. It actually depends on the reason, like defending territory/people, protecting allies from invasion, defending human rights, and punishing wrongdoing. For those, you can't just sit there.

  • War is only justified if it is intervening with a genocidal country.

    Take WW2 for instance. If the Allied powers hadn't gone to war with Germany, more than just 6 million people would've died. The total death count would've been more like 10 million, if you also include the gypsies, Catholics, gay people, Jehovah's Witnesses and other groups that the Nazi's considered inferior. So tell me, all the people out there who believe war is not justified, how is, say, causing the deaths of over 10 million innocent people (an even more gargantuan number if the Holocaust never ended and Germany took over all of Europe) by not going to war better than causing the deaths of about 40 million soldiers to prevent innocent bloodshed at the hands of malicious dictators for years. So, I say once more, war is justified.

  • War can be justified for reasons such as

    Self defense , last resort and protection of humanitarians. For example when Japan bombed us first we had to strike back because one they where holding our soldiers hostage and mistreating them, and with Germany we had to save jewish people, and then they kept imperialising other countries so we asked them to stop but they didnt so brittian and france declared war when they invaded poland.

  • What brought us out of the depression?

    War, war is our friend because when you look at how much America was suffering from the Great Depression. When tension rose in Europe the Americans prepared bullets, weapons, and tanks. And when we were making those... What is the main idea of getting money? Jobs! And what opens jobs is making supplies! So why is war good? Think actually about the past.

  • What brought us out of the depression?

    War, war is our friend because when you look at how much America was suffering from the Great Depression. When tension rose in Europe the Americans prepared bullets, weapons, and tanks. And when we were making those... What is the main idea of getting money? Jobs! And what opens jobs is making supplies! So why is war good? Think actually about the past.

  • What brought us out of the depression?

    War, war is our friend because when you look at how much America was suffering from the Great Depression. When tension rose in Europe the Americans prepared bullets, weapons, and tanks. And when we were making those... What is the main idea of getting money? Jobs! And what opens jobs is making supplies! So why is war good? Think actually about the past.

  • Describe a specific situation in which violence might be justified as a way to resolve disputes. Discuss what you think determines whether or not violence is justified as a way to resolve disputes.

    In an ideal world, violence would never need to be resorted to in order to resolve disputes. Violence, which we can look upon as physical attack (whether beating, shooting, or torture), is harmful. It can cause serious injury and or death, and resorting to violence almost always makes a dispute more difficult to solve than other means of conflict resolution. For example, consider two country’s that are in dispute over the ownership of an area of land. If the countries were to try and solve their problems peacefully through negotiation, mediation and compromise, it may result in mild tension and animosity but it isn’t likely to lead to any deep seeded bitterness or remorse. In contrast, say the two nations went to war over the piece of land; people would be killed, buildings and infrastructure would be destroyed and the tension between the two countries would increase substantially making any future efforts of negotiation much more difficult. Because of the human and economic harm inflicted by acts of violence like war or domestic violence, ethics and reason recommend that it be avoided at all cost as a means of resolving disputes.

    Yet, there are certain situations when violence may be justified as a way of countering conflict. Take World War II as an example. By the late 1930s Hitler was advancing his plans to expand Germany. He had annexed parts of France, as well as Austria and Poland. At first Allied governments tried to reason and negotiate truces and settlements with Hitler to avoid conflict in the hope that his ambitions would be short-sighted. Britain and France allowed Hitler to follow through with many of his annexations in exchange for a promise that he not pose further threat to any more neighboring countries. But the British and French were fooled into believing that Hitler would stop his aggressive expansion. Hitler eyes were set on European domination, no matter the extent of compromise and reward that his opponents sent his way. In the end, Britain and France recognized Hitler’s true motives and understood that since he planned to take over all of Europe, war was eventually inevitable, so they had to act before he gained too much power.

    In cases like the example of World War II in Europe, violence was the only option to resolve conflict. All other options, like conversation, dialogue and economic concessions had failed or were bound to fail. In general, violence is only justified as a way to resolve disputes when all other options have failed. Violence is extremely destructive and it sensible to avoid it at all costs. But a second criteria also has to be established. The opposing party has to be directly causing harm to a person or group of people. If two parties are in dispute and can’t find a solution, violence is not the option. However, if one party is directly harming a group of people – like the Nazi’s who threatened the independence and freedoms of many European citizens and had already used violence as a means of achieving their ends – violence may be the only resort.

    Like this:

    LikeLoading...

    Related

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

    One thought on “War Can Never Be Justified Essay

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *